Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-04 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T is much better than Samsung Galaxy A02s, with a general score of 82.2 against 74.5. These phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A02s has Android 11. The Xiaomi Mi 9T design is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A02s, although it was released about a year before.
Xiaomi Mi 9T features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also has 3 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a lot better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T features a greater camera than Galaxy A02s, because it has a way higher video quality, a larger aperture for better low light images and a back camera with a much better resolution. The Galaxy A02s has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A02s has greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.