Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-04 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a global score of 82.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A02s's 74.5 score. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro construction is a little thinner and a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy A02s, although it was released around a year before. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A02s has Android 11.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a higher display pixels density. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A02s has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A02s, because it has a way higher (4K) video definition, a way higher 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy A02s features better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.