Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A02s's 74.5 score. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A02s were released with only a couple months difference, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's design is just a little heavier but also a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A02s. These devices use Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A02s has Android 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A02s, because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A02s, because it has a way better video resolution, a way more megapixels back facing camera and a bigger aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery performance is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A02s's battery duration, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A02s. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A02s, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.