Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-08-18 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is a lot better than the Galaxy A03s, getting a general score of 93.3 against 74. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy A03s comes with Android 11 operating system. The iPhone 13 Pro design is a bit heavier but somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A03s, and they were released only 1 months apart.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a way better display than Galaxy A03s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1170 x 2532px resolution and a lot higher screen density. The iPhone 13 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A03s, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a quite better performance than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and 3 GB more RAM memory. IPhone 13 Pro has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot larger aperture for better photos in low-light situations and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Galaxy A03s features a way better battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.