Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-18 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than the Galaxy A03s, having an 88.1 score against 74. The iPhone X design is somewhat thinner and lighter than Galaxy A03s, even though it was released many years before. Apple iPhone X features an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better display density and a way higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution.
The Apple iPhone X features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because although it has less processing cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64 bits processor. The iPhone X counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a larger aperture.
The iPhone X counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A03s, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A03s has a way better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has an 84% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.