Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-08-18 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A03s's overall score of 74. Even though HTC One M9 is extremely older and just a bit thicker than the Galaxy A03s, it's design is still somewhat lighter. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and Galaxy A03s has Android 11.
HTC One M9 has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and way more pixels per inch in the screen. HTC One M9 features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A03s, and although they both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount, the HTC One M9 also has an additional GPU and a 64 bits processor.
HTC One M9 takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A03s, and although they both have the same aperture, the HTC One M9 also has a way more megapixels back camera and a much higher (4K) video resolution. The HTC One M9 features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A03s, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the HTC One M9 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 128 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A03s features a way better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.