Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A03s's 74 global score. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A03s, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. LG V35 ThinQ has an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way better count of pixels per screen inch.
LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A03s, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A03s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a superior camera than Galaxy A03s, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a back camera with a higher 16 MP resolution and a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations. Galaxy A03s counts with a superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.