Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than the Galaxy A03s, having a score of 87.1 against 74. LG Velvet is an older cellphone than Galaxy A03s, but LG could make it a little lighter and thinner anyway. LG Velvet counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because it has a bit bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG Velvet counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A03s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has 3 GB more RAM. LG Velvet counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A03s, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The LG Velvet has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A03s, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A03s counts with improved battery life than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.