Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a general score of 89.6, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy A03s's general score of 74. Motorola edge is an older and a bit thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A03s, but Motorola was able to build it just a little lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola edge has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A03s has Android 11 version.
Motorola edge has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because it has a greater screen density, a bit bigger screen and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Motorola edge counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A03s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola edge also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola edge features a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A03s features a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Motorola edge takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy A03s, because it has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera, a way higher video resolution and a larger camera aperture for better images and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.