Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-08-18 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is just a bit better than Galaxy A03s, with a score of 75.8 against 74. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto Z Force has a more recent 7.0 Nougat version while Galaxy A03s has Android 11 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features. The Moto Z Force is an noticeably older phone than the Galaxy A03s, but Motorola was able to build it a lot thinner and lighter.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a better looking display than Galaxy A03s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixel number per inch of screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A03s, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A03s features a little better performance than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores. Motorola Moto Z Force features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because it has a lot better (4K) video quality, a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a larger aperture for better low light photography and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A03s features a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.