Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Galaxy A03s, with a score of 87 against 74. Motorola razr (2020) is an older phone than the Galaxy A03s, but Motorola was able to build it a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should give identical OS features.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a better resolution of 876 x 2142px. The Motorola razr (2020) features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A03s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A03s, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A03s has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79 percent more battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A03s, because it has a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a way larger aperture and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.