Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Galaxy A03s, having a score of 90.8 against 74. The Galaxy Note 20 body is a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Galaxy A03s, even though it was released a little bit over a year before. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A03s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A03s, because it has a quite bigger screen, a better display pixels density and a much higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A03s, because it has 96 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy Note 20 features a lot better camera than Galaxy A03s, because although it has a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments and a lot higher video resolution. The Galaxy A03s counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.