Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A03s's 74 overall score. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older and just a little bit heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A03s, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat thinner anyway. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Galaxy A03s has Android 11, providing the user a couple additional features and increased performance.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A03s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better display than Galaxy A03s, because it has a quite bigger display, a lot greater pixels density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because it has a larger camera aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited environments, a lot higher video definition and a camera with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy A03s has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.