Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-18 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A03s, getting a score of 83.3 against 74. Even though Samsung Galaxy S9 is noticeably older than the Samsung Galaxy A03s, it's body is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter. Galaxy S9 counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A03s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a way better screen pixel density.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A03s, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 400 GB. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a little better performance than Galaxy A03s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S9 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because although it has a back camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition and a lot larger camera aperture. Galaxy A03s features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.