Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Galaxy A03s, with a general score of 94.6 against 74. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and extremely heavier than the Galaxy A03s, it's construction is still notably thinner. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better looking screen than Galaxy A03s, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a larger screen and a much higher 1768 x 2208 resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A03s, because it has 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A03s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A03s, because although it has a lesser megapixels back camera, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
Galaxy A03s counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.