Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-18 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A03s's global score of 74. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version and Galaxy A03s has Android 11. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is a little bit thinner than Galaxy A03s, but it's a little heavier and was released around 16 months before.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A03s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better screen than Galaxy A03s, because it has a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch, a little larger display and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a much better (4K) video quality and a much more mega pixels camera in the back. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A03s, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A03s and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro both feature incredibly similar batteries, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 0 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.