Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is better than the Galaxy A10's global score of 72.3. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy A10 has Android 11 operating system. Even being the best in our current comparison, iPhone 11 Pro Max's design is a bit thicker and much heavier than Galaxy A10.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a superior hardware performance than Galaxy A10, because although it has lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 11 Pro Max features an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A10, because it has a lot higher 1242 x 2688 resolution, a way higher display density and a quite bigger screen.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a way higher video resolution, a bigger sensor and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments. The Galaxy A10 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A10, because it has a 3969mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A10. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro Max, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A10, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.