Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 is way better than Galaxy A10, with an 88.7 score against 72.3. The Apple iPhone 12 has iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A10 comes with Android 11 operating system. The Apple iPhone 12 construction is newer, a little thinner and just a bit lighter than the Galaxy A10. The iPhone 12 counts with a much greater performance than Galaxy A10, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor and a larger amount of RAM.
IPhone 12 has an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a much better amount of pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A10 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 12, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 has superior battery duration than iPhone 12, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 2815mAh. IPhone 12 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video and a much better video quality.
Although Apple iPhone 12 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A10, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.