Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is way better than Galaxy A10, with a global score of 92.8 against 72.3. IPhone 12 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A10 works with Android 11 operating system. The iPhone 12 Pro body is newer and just a little thinner than the Galaxy A10's, but it is somewhat heavier.
IPhone 12 Pro has a lot better processing power than Galaxy A10, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor and a greater amount of RAM. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher display pixels density and a way higher 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light situations. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A10 has better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy A10, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.