Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max is a lot better than the Galaxy A10, getting a 93.2 score against 72.3. The iPhone 12 Pro Max body is newer and just a little thinner, but way heavier than Galaxy A10. IPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy A10 counts with Android 11 OS. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A10, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a much greater pixel number per inch of screen.
IPhone 12 Pro Max features a little bit better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 4 GB more RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A10, because it has an 8 percent more battery size. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A10. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A10, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.