Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-03-19 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A10's 72.3 general score. IPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy A10 comes with Android 11 operating system. The iPhone 13 Pro design is much newer and a little thinner, but also heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A10.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better screen pixel density and a lot higher 1170 x 2532px resolution. IPhone 13 Pro has a much better performance than Galaxy A10, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 4 GB more RAM memory and a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy A10, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way bigger aperture. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a little bit better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A10 counts with a bit superior battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A10. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A10, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.