Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus is a lot better than Galaxy A10, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 72.3. The iPhone 8 Plus design is a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A10, but it is somewhat heavier and was released around a year before. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a much better display than Galaxy A10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A10, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. IPhone 8 Plus counts with a better performance than Galaxy A10, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor and a greater amount of RAM.
The iPhone 8 Plus captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor, a way higher video resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 counts with longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 2691mAh.
Although iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A10. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A10, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.