Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a lot better than Galaxy A10's 72.3 global score. Although iPhone X is older and a little bit heavier than the Galaxy A10, it's construction is still just a little bit thinner. The Apple iPhone X features a much sharper display than Galaxy A10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a much better pixels density.
The Apple iPhone X features a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. The iPhone X counts with a better processing power than Galaxy A10, because although it has lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and 1 GB more RAM.
IPhone X takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a back camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos and a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy A10 counts with greater battery life than iPhone X, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A10. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A10, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.