Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is much better than the Galaxy A10's 72.3 score. IPhone XR is an a bit thicker and heavier phone than Galaxy A10. IPhone XR features a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone XR features a sharper display than Galaxy A10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a little higher 828 x 1792px resolution. The Galaxy A10 has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A10 features a bit better battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh. The iPhone XR captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures, a larger sensor and a lot higher video definition.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A10. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A10, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.