Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is better than Galaxy A10, getting a general score of 84.2 against 72.3. Even though iPhone XS and Galaxy A10 were released with only a couple of months difference, the iPhone XS construction is a little heavier but also just a bit thinner. The iPhone XS has a more powerful CPU than Galaxy A10, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a 64-bit processor.
The iPhone XS features a way better display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1125 x 2436px resolution and a lot better number of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A10 features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XS, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A10 counts with better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 3400mAh battery size instead of 2659mAh. IPhone XS shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger camera sensor capturing better quality pictures and a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A10. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A10, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.