Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A10's 72.3 general score. Google Pixel 3 XL is a a bit heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy A10, but both of them have the same thickness. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 XL features an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a lot better quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a bit larger screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2960. The Galaxy A10 has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A10, because it has a 3430mAh battery size against 3400mAh. The Google Pixel 3 XL features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A10, because although it has a lower 12.2 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures, a bigger aperture and a much higher video resolution.
Google Pixel 3 XL costs more money than Galaxy A10, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.