Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is much better than the Galaxy A10's 72.3 score. Although the Google Pixel 4 and the Galaxy A10 were released with only a few months difference, the Google Pixel 4 design is a little lighter but also just a little thicker than the Galaxy A10. Google Pixel 4 has a superior processor than Galaxy A10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A10, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater display pixels density and a much better 1080 x 2280 resolution. The Google Pixel 4 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low-light situations and a larger sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
Galaxy A10 features a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A10 counts with greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 21 percent more battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A10. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel 4, else you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A10, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.