Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is much better than Galaxy A10's 72.3 overall score. Google Pixel 4 XL's body is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy A10. Google Pixel 4 XL features a much sharper display than Galaxy A10, because it has a quite bigger screen, a lot better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a quite better processing power than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little better battery performance than Galaxy A10, because it has a 3700mAh battery size. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better camera than Galaxy A10, because although it has a worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images, a lot higher video quality and a larger back camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A10. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A10, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.