Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A10, having an 87.5 score against 72.3. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design weights the same than the Samsung Galaxy A10, but it's just a little thicker. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better performance than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a better looking display than Galaxy A10, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a lot greater screen pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 4a 5G captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture, a way higher video quality and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A10. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel 4a 5G, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A10, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.