Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than Galaxy A10, having an 89 score against 72.3. The Google Pixel 5 is a lighter phone than Galaxy A10, but they are 0.31inches thick. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of screen.
Google Pixel 5 has a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 5 features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 features improved battery life than Galaxy A10, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 5 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a larger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A10. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, else you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A10, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.