Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 271 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a general score of 77.7, which is a bit better than Galaxy A10's general score of 72.3. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and Galaxy A10 has Android 11 version. Despite of the fact the HTC One M9 is extremely older and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A10, it's design is still a little lighter.
The HTC One M9 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1920 x 1080px resolution. HTC One M9 features a superior hardware performance than Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also has more RAM, an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bits CPU.
HTC One M9 counts with a better camera than Galaxy A10, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much better video resolution and a back facing camera with a way better resolution. Galaxy A10 counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A10 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 counts with improved battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery size.
The HTC One M9 costs more than Samsung Galaxy A10, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.