Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-03-19 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| $ 151.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G5 has an overall score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A10's score of 72.3. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G5 has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A10 has Android 11 version, so it gives some extra features. Although the LG G5 is much older than the Galaxy A10, it's design is just a bit lighter and just a little thinner.
LG G5 has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has lesser cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG G5 counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way better pixel amount per inch of display.
The LG G5 features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A10, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG G5 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG G5 captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a back camera with a higher 16 mega-pixels resolution, a larger camera aperture to take better captures in low light situations, a lot higher (4K) video quality and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A10 counts with better battery life than LG G5, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery size.
Although LG G5 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A10. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A10, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.