Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-19 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a general score of 77, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A10's 72.3 global score. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but LG G7 Fit has a more recent 8.1 Oreo version and Galaxy A10 has Android 11, providing the user some nice extra features. LG G7 Fit's construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy A10, but it is a little bit lighter.
LG G7 Fit has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixel amount per inch of display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG G7 Fit has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A10, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G7 Fit features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A10, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory. LG G7 Fit shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have a same size sensor, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a better 16 MP resolution back camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 has a bit longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.