Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A10's score of 72.3. Although it's the best in this review, LG G8X ThinQ's construction is heavier and a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A10. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a brighter screen than Galaxy A10, because it has a better pixel density, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite larger display. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A10, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a better performing processing unit than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG G8X ThinQ features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy A10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A10, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.