Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has a global score of 78.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A10's general score of 72.3. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the LG V10 has the previous 5.1 version and Galaxy A10 has Android 11. Although the LG V10 is better than Galaxy A10, we must tell that it's also extremely older, heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Galaxy A10 has just a little better performance than LG V10, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. LG V10 features a much better screen than Galaxy A10, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a much higher pixel amount per screen inch.
LG V10 features a better camera than Galaxy A10, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and video, a more mega pixels back-facing camera, a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs and a lot better video resolution. LG V10 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 has just a little bit longer battery life than LG V10, because it has a 3400mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A10. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG V10, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A10, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.