Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-03-19 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is much better than the Galaxy A10's 72.3 score. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A10 has Android 11 version, providing you a couple additional features. The LG V30S ThinQ construction is a little thinner and a little lighter than Galaxy A10, although it was released around 12 months before.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM. LG V30S ThinQ has a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a way higher display pixels density.
LG V30S ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A10, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A10, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a back camera with more MP, a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures and a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low light situations.
The Galaxy A10 counts with just a bit better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy A10, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.