Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is better than Samsung Galaxy A10, with an 81.2 score against 72.3. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11 version. Although the LG V40 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy A10 were released only a couple of months apart, LG V40 ThinQ's body is a little heavier but also just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A10.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a better performing CPU than Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a little bit larger display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a way greater display density.
LG V40 ThinQ shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition, a bigger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a lot larger aperture to take better photography in low-light situations.
LG V40 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A10, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A10 has just a bit longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ costs more than the Samsung Galaxy A10, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.