Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A10, getting an 87.1 score against 72.3. The LG Velvet body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A10, but it is a little bit heavier. LG Velvet features a brighter screen than Galaxy A10, because it has a greater pixel number in each inch in the screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a bit bigger screen.
LG Velvet counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM memory. The LG Velvet counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a lot bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images, a way more MP back facing camera and a way better (4K) video definition.
The LG Velvet features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features superior battery life than Galaxy A10, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
The LG Velvet is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A10, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.