Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A10, with a global score of 91.2 against 72.3. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but LG Wing has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11 version. The LG Wing design is newer, but notably thicker and noticeably heavier than Samsung Galaxy A10.
LG Wing has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Wing also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The LG Wing features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a greater pixels amount in each display inch, a much higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a bit larger display.
The LG Wing has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG Wing counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
The LG Wing has a very superior camera than Galaxy A10, because it has a much better video quality, a larger aperture to take better low light images, a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A10. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy A10, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.