Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A10, with a score of 89.6 against 72.3. These phones work with Android OS, but Motorola edge has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11. The Motorola edge body is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A10's, but it's heavier and thicker.
The Motorola edge has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A10, because it has a quite larger display, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and more pixels per inch in the display. Motorola edge has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A10, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola edge counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola edge also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola edge counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures, a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better video definition.
Motorola edge counts with improved battery life than Galaxy A10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
The Motorola edge costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A10, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.