Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A10, with a 78.5 score against 72.3. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion design has the same weight than the Samsung Galaxy A10, but it's a little bit thinner. These devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a more recent 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11.
The Galaxy A10 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a way better display than Galaxy A10, because it has a higher screen pixel density, a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little larger display.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a way better camera than Galaxy A10, because it has a much better video resolution, a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution, a way bigger camera sensor and a larger aperture. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A10, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has improved battery performance than Galaxy A10, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.