Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is much better than the Galaxy A10's 72.3 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a notably newer device than the Galaxy A10, but it's a little heavier and just a little thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and Galaxy A10 has Android 11 version, so it provides a lot of extra features and performance tweaks.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A10, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a bit larger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A10, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A10 has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A10, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a much larger aperture for better low light photos and videos and a camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A10, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.