Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-03-19 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 151.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A10, with a score of 75.8 against 72.3. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto Z Force has the newer 7.0 Nougat version while Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11 version. Although Moto Z Force is noticeably older than the Samsung Galaxy A10, it's body is just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner.
Moto Z Force features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM. The Moto Z Force has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better screen pixel density and a way higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Moto Z Force has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. Moto Z Force shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A10, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Moto Z Force has a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola Moto Z Force is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A10. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A10, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.