Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-19 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A10, getting a general score of 77.6 against 72.3. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Moto Z3 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A10 has Android 11, so it gives a couple additional features. Moto Z3's construction is thinner and a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A10, even when they were released with only a couple months difference.
The Moto Z3 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto Z3 also has more RAM memory. The Moto Z3 has a sharper display than Galaxy A10, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels.
The Moto Z3 counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A10, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A10 has a little longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 3400mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Moto Z3 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a lower resolution back camera and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photos, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A10. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Moto Z3, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A10, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.