Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 151.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a global score of 78.5, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A10's general score of 72.3. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Motorola One Action's body is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A10. The Motorola One Action has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola One Action also has 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola One Action counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A10, because it has a way higher count of pixels per display inch, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a little bigger screen. Motorola One Action takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
The Motorola One Action features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A10, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Action counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A10, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.