Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a score of 80.7, which is much better than the Galaxy A10's overall score of 72.3. Motorola One Vision is better than the Galaxy A10, we must note that it's also a little thicker and a little heavier. The Motorola One Vision features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a way greater pixel count per display inch, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a bit bigger display.
Motorola One Vision features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A10, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola One Vision also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Vision has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Vision takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A10, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a way more MP camera, a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot better (4K) video resolution. The Motorola One Vision has a little better battery performance than Galaxy A10, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.