Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is better than the Galaxy A10, having a score of 80 against 72.3. The Motorola One Zoom is a heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the Galaxy A10. Motorola One Zoom counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Zoom also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Zoom features a better screen than Galaxy A10, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit bigger screen. Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola One Zoom features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a much better (4K) video quality, a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture and a back-facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution. Motorola One Zoom features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A10. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A10, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.