Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is way better than Galaxy A10's 72.3 general score. The Motorola razr (2020) is a heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A10, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
Motorola razr (2020) has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A10, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a better pixels count in each inch of display and a higher 876 x 2142 pixels resolution. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) features a way better camera than Galaxy A10, because it has a way better resolution back facing camera, a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot better video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A10 has improved battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 21% larger battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A10. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A10, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.