Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 271 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a global score of 79.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A10's overall score of 72.3. Even though the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is somewhat heavier than the Galaxy A10, it's noticeably thinner and a lot newer. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has newer 15 version while Galaxy A10 has Android 11, so it offers a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy A10 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with way more MP.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A10, because it has a 38 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.