Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is better than Galaxy A10, getting an 80.8 score against 72.3. Nokia XR20 is a newer phone than Galaxy A10, although it's notably thicker and way heavier. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS. Nokia XR20 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia XR20 also has more RAM memory.
Nokia XR20 has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, more pixels per inch in the display and a bit larger screen. Nokia XR20 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has higher video frame rates, a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures.
The Nokia XR20 features a superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Nokia XR20 also has more internal storage. Nokia XR20 has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A10. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Nokia XR20, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A10, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.